RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net

Email Address
Site Index

If you haven't already done so, please read the San Leandro section on the Camera Towns page

San Leandro Documents

Some of San Leandro's tickets can possibly be ignored.  If your "ticket" does not have the Superior Court's name and address on it, it is what I call a "Snitch Ticket."  For more details, see the Snitch Ticket section on the Your Ticket page.

If you have a San Leandro red light camera ticket, be sure to look at the Countywide Information, on the Oakland Documents page.


San Leandro Docs Set # 1
Ticket Counts

Total Violations, Notices Printed [4]

New 9-18-10

Cam #
14DA
01
14FA
01
HAWA
01
HAWA
03
LEWA
01
MATE
01












E. 14th
Nbd
@
Davis
Fair-
mont
Ebd
@
E. 14th
Halcyon
Wbd
@
Wash-
ington
[6]
Floresta
Ebd
@
Wash-
ington
[6]
Lewel-
ling
Ebd
@
Wash-
ington
Marina
Ebd
@
Tea-
garden






[3]

Total
Citations
Issued
as %
of Events
Re-
corded
Total
Violations
Recorded/
Notices
Printed
[1] [4]

Jan06
[5]

















Feb06
[5]

















Mar06
[5]

















Apr06
[5]

















May06
[5]

















Jun06
[5]

















Jul06
[5]

















Aug06

















Sep06

















Oct06

















Nov06

















Dec06



































Jan07
[5]

















Feb07

















Mar07

















Apr07

















May07

















Jun07

















Jul07
[5]

















Aug07

















Sep07

















Oct07

















Nov07

















Dec07



































Jan08
[5]

















Feb08

















Mar08

















Apr08

















May08

















Jun08

















Jul08
[5]

















Aug08

















Sep08

















Oct08

















Nov08

















Dec08



































Jan09
[5]

















Feb09

















Mar09

















Apr09

















May09

















Jun09

















Jul09
[5]

















Aug09

















Sep09

















Oct09

















Nov09

















Dec09



































Jan10
[5]

















Feb10

















Mar10

















3 Months
Apr-Jun10
437
127
936
402
1644
473
2888
594
51
7
876
468









6832
2071

May10

















Jun10

















Jul10
[5]

















Aug10

















Sep10

















Oct10

















Nov10

















Dec10
[8]
97
30
257
121
284
75
430
150
13
4
257
144









1338
524



















Jan11 -
Feb11
2 Months
[9]
176
66
457
197
570
208
862
338
-
-
405
200









2470
1009



















Mar11
[8]
86
20
188
52
278
82
502
143
-
-
275
98









1329
395

Apr11 -
Oct11
6.4 Months
[9]
584
107
1439
568
2055
422
4421
960
-
-
1877
708









10376
2765













































































































Nov11

















Dec11



































Cam #
14DA
01
14FA
01
HAWA
01
HAWA
03
LEWA
01
MATE
01











[10]
E. 14th
Nbd
@
Davis
Fair-
mont
Ebd
@
E. 14th
Halcyon
Wbd
@
Wash-
ington
[6]
Floresta
Ebd
@
Wash-
ington
[6]
Lewel-
ling
Ebd
@
Wash-
ington
Marina
Ebd
@
Tea-
garden






[3]

Total
Citations
Issued
as %
of Events
Re-
corded
Total
Violations
Recorded/
Notices
Printed
[1] [4]


This table made by highwayrobbery.net, using official reports provided by the City under the California Public Records Act.

Official report, Apr. 1 - Jun. 30, 2010
Official report, Dec. 2010
Official report, Mar. 2011
Official reports, Jan. 2011 - Feb. 2011 and Apr. 2011 - Oct. 2011

[  ] indicates a footnote.
[1]  Totals are as provided by the City.
[2]  YTD = Year-to-date total.
[3]  Un-used columns are to allow for later expansion of City's system.
[4]  Except where noted otherwise, the figures given in the table are for the single calendar month indicated.  Any figures in red type (or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, the upper figure when there are two or more figures in a cell) are what RedFlex calls Total Violations, or all incidents recorded by the cameras, and due to time limitations may have been posted here only for selected months or locations.  If there is sufficient public interest, the remaining months will be posted.  The figures in black type are what RedFlex calls Notices Printed, and represent the sum of genuine citations issued (those filed with the court) plus any Nominations mailed (not filed with the court, a.k.a. Snitch Tickets).
[5]  Monthly data was requested on 9-18-10 but has not yet been received.
[6]  The camera enforcement is believed to be on traffic on the first-named street, but the direction of enforcement (east, or west) has not yet been confirmed.
[7]  Includes enforcement of posted "no turn on red" signs.
[8]  From official report posted on City's website - see link in Docs Set # 4, below.
[9] City claimed not to have individual calendar-month reports available, so was asked to provide copies of the reports it had on hand.  These reports were received on Oct. 27, 2011.
[10]  The title bar has been repeated solely for the convenience of the reader - there is no difference between it and the one at the top of the table.


San Leandro Docs Set # 2
"Late Time" Graphs

  The City has refused to provide bar graphs for its cameras.


Grand Terrace late times bar chart
The picture above is an example from another city.


Bar graphs are available for more than forty other cities - see the list in the expanded version of Defect # 9.



San Leandro Docs Set # 3
The Contracts

2005 Contract
2011 Contract (signed)
2011 Staff Report
2011 Minutes

On Sept. 6, 2005 the city council gave preliminary approval to a contract with RedFlex, for cameras at five intersections. The contract included an illegal "cost neutrality" clause, whereby the city would not have to pay RedFlex
 the full rent if fine revenue was insufficient to cover the rent.  See Subsection B. of Defect # 10.
The staff report prepared for the Sept. 6 council meeting also contained this remarkable sentence:
"Conclusion. Although San Leandro has not yet experienced a serious problem with traffic collisions directly related
to red light violations, the city is continuing to experience an increase in the overall amount of traffic flow throughout the community."


2011:  New Contract

On Apr. 18, 2011 the city council heard public comments from four San Leandro residents who questioned the use of the cameras and none who supported the cameras (see Staff Report and Minutes, above), then voted 4 - 3 (ayes:  Prola, Starosciak, Reed, Souza) to accept a new 8-year contact under which the City will pay $5200 monthly rent per camera for five of the six existing cameras.  One camera is to be removed.  Cost neutrality was replaced by "financial feasibility" - see Section 7.2 of the new contract.

They paid way too much.

  They did not need to pay $5200 rent for the existing cameras.  Nor did they need to agree to an eight-year term in order to get a good price.  A number of California cities have renewed at around $3000 per month per existing camera, with much shorter terms.  For example, Oceanside's five-year contract (available on the Oceanside Documents page) sets a $3052 rent for its four original cameras, and Hawthorne's three-year contract (available on the Hawthorne Documents page) sets a $2800 rent for its seven original cameras.  If San Leandro had negotiated hard, or put the contract out to bid, it could have saved at least $2000 per month per camera, or $960,000 over the eight years of the program.

Nor did the city council need to agree to pay $6300 for new cameras.  A close-by example:  Burlingame paid only $5870.   Had the City negotiated to obtain the (optional) five new cameras for the same rate as Burlingame, it could have saved $206,000 over eight years.

Thus, the city council gave away $1.2 million of City money, just because it failed to negotiate hard on the rent.

  There is another problem with the contract.  It contains no escape clause should a future city council wish to terminate the contract, or if the voters terminate the contract via initiative.  A complete contract will include a formula by which the cost of such a "for convenience" termination is to be calculated. For an example of such a formula, see Section 6.2 in Victorville's original contract (available on the Victorville Documents page).


This list of contracts and amendments may not be up-to-date - there could be a contract or amendment later than the one listed above.



San Leandro Docs Set # 4
Info at PD Site

The police department's
red light camera web page  has extensive materials about the program - including business rules, guidelines, and as of Dec. 2, 2011, the official report showing the number of tickets issued in March 2011.




San Leandro Docs Set # 5
More Coming

There may be some more San Leandro information posted in the next few weeks.  Mark your calendar to remind you to come back here and look!


 

---------------------------------
RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net