|
Email Address
Site Index
If you haven't already done so,
please read the Redding section on the Camera
Towns
page.
Redding Documents
Some of Redding's tickets can possibly be
ignored. If your "ticket" does not have the Superior Court's name
and address on it, it is what I call a "Snitch Ticket." For more
details, see the Snitch Ticket section on the Your Ticket page.
Redding Docs Set # 1
Ticket Counts
Total
Violations, Notices Printed [4]
New
11-12-10, updated 4-17-12
Cam #
|
CCCY
-01
|
CYBE
-01
|
CYBE
-03
|
MALA
-01
|
MASH
-01
|
PITE
-01
|
SHMA
-01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Churn
Creek
&
Cypress
[6]
|
Cypress
&
Bechelli
[6]
|
Cypress
&
Bechelli
[6]
|
Market
&
Lake
[6]
|
Market
&
Shasta
[6]
|
Pine
&
Tehama
[6]
|
Shasta
&
Market
[6]
|
|
|
|
[3]
|
|
Total
Citations
Issued
as %
of Events
Recorded |
Total
Violations
Recorded/
Notices
Printed
[1] [4]
|
|
Aug07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep07
|
0
0
|
214
118
|
174
101
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
388
219
|
|
Oct07
|
0
0 |
167
69
|
120
72
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
141
|
|
Nov07
|
0
0 |
178
99
|
139
85
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
184
|
|
Dec07
|
0
0 |
157
88
|
158
114
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
315
202
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan08
|
0
0 |
137
69
|
139
98
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
167
|
|
Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul08
|
115
45
|
99
54
|
73
17
|
0
0 |
329
189
|
0
0 |
91
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707
327
|
|
Aug08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan09
|
31
13
|
71
45
|
34
25
|
95
62
|
272
165
|
0
0 |
79
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
348
|
|
Feb09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul09
|
33
12
|
89
52
|
41
30
|
608
218
|
200
123
|
91
27
|
81
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1143
491
|
|
Aug09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan10
|
15
8
|
67
38
|
33
19
|
229
102
|
153
109
|
98
76
|
72
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667
378
|
|
Feb10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul10
|
37
15
|
126
77
|
31
19
|
221
75
|
222
139
|
120
77
|
76
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833
419
|
|
Aug10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep10
|
27
14
|
87
60
|
45
24
|
189
76
|
192
129
|
85
60
|
92
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
717
389
|
|
Oct10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan11
|
18
8
|
50
28
|
27
18
|
164
70
|
112
71
|
110
84
|
70
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551
301
|
|
Feb11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul11
|
28
20
|
122
65
|
44
19
|
256
102
|
151
96
|
98
64
|
92
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791
392
|
|
Aug11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan12
|
20
4
|
66
41
|
36
28
|
99
36
|
71
45
|
70
52
|
77
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
231
|
|
Feb12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar12
|
32
19
|
92
64
|
45
33
|
32
10
|
100
57
|
48
32
|
96
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445
245
|
|
Apr12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This table made by
highwayrobbery.net, using official reports provided
by the City under the California Public Records Act.
Official reports, 2007 - 2010
Official
reports, 2011 - 2012
[ ] indicates a footnote.
[1] Totals are as provided by the City.
[2] YTD = Year-to-date total.
[3] Un-used columns are to allow for
later expansion of City's system.
[4] Any figures in red type
(or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, the upper
figure when there are two or more figures in a cell) are what RedFlex
calls Total Violations, or all incidents recorded by
the cameras, and due to time limitations may have been posted
here only for selected months or locations.
If there is sufficient public interest, the remaining months will be
posted. The figures in black
type are what RedFlex calls Notices Printed, and represent the
sum of genuine citations issued (those filed with the court) plus
any Nominations mailed (not filed with the court, a.k.a. Snitch
Tickets).
[5] Monthly data was requested on ----- but has
not yet been received.
[6] The camera enforcement is believed to be on
traffic on the first-named street, but the direction of
enforcement (north, south, east, west, thru, left, right) is not yet
available.
[7] Includes enforcement of posted "no turn on red"
signs.
Redding Docs Set # 2
"Late Time" Graphs
The City provided bar graphs
of Late Times, etcetera, for all of its cameras.
These graphs track violations recorded, not tickets issued.
Where there is a large number of long Late Time violations in a curb
lane, it is believed to indicate heavy ticketing on right turns.
(The curb lane will be the lane with the highest lane number.)

The picture above is an example from another city.
CCCY 2008
CCCY2010
CYBE-01 2008
CYBE-01 2010
CYBE-03 2008
CYBE-03 2010
MALA 2008
MALA 2010
MASH 2008
MASH 2010
PITE 2008
PITE 2010
SHMA 2008
SHMA 2010
Bar graphs are available for more than forty
other cities - see the list
in the expanded version of Defect # 9.
Redding Docs Set # 3
The Contract, and the
Council Elections
2007
Contract
2009
Amendment
The 2007 contract (approved 4 - 1 by
Dickerson, Murray, Stegall and Bosetti, with Jones voting "no")
includes
an illegal "cost
neutrality" clause, whereby the city does not have to pay RedFlex the
full rent if there aren't enough fines to cover the cost. See
Subsection B. of Defect # 10.
In 2009 the contract was amended (approved 4 - 1 by Dickerson,
McArthur, Stegall and Bosetti, with Jones voting "no") but cost
neutrality
was retained.
As of late 2011 the city council has an opportunity - if it
wishes - to cancel
the program, immediately, without paying an early-termination
penalty. The Sept. 2011 decision in P. v. Daugherty
says that cost neutral contracts like Redding's are illegal, a
violation of CVC 21455.5(g).
If the city council won't do an immediate termination, then the next
opportunity will be June 2012, when the contract hits its expiration
date. Since there's a council election a few months later in Nov.
2012, it's
predictable that the incumbents who want to be re-elected (McArthur,
Dickerson) will come out against the cameras. But to get rid of
the cameras, it will take at least three votes. The third could
come from Jones, who has always voted against the cameras.
This list of contracts and amendments
may not be
up-to-date - there could be a
contract or amendment later than the ones listed above.
Redding Docs Set # 4
Info on RPD Site
There is program info, including a link to
signal timing sheets, at the police
department's website.
Redding Docs Set # 5
More Coming
There may be some more Redding information
posted in the next few weeks. Mark your calendar to remind you to
come back here and look!
---------------------------------
RED
LIGHT
CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net
|