If you
haven't
already done so, please read the Union City section on the Camera
Towns
page
Union City
Documents
Program Closed
On June 7, 2010 an Oakland Tribune article revealed that Union City
would not be renewing the contract, which expired during June.
Some of Union City's tickets can possibly be
ignored.
If your "ticket" does not have the Superior Court's name and
address on it, it is what I call a "Snitch Ticket." For more
details, see the Snitch Ticket
section
on the Your Ticket page and Set
#
1, below.
If you have a Union City red light camera ticket that you haven't taken care of yet, please be sure to contact me.
Union City Docs
Set # 1
Ticket
Counts
Total Violations,
Notices Printed [4]
| Cam # |
ALH 01 |
ALH 03 |
MITA 01 |
MITA 03 |
UNLO 01 |
UNRO 01 |
UNSM 01 |
UNSM 03 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
[5] |
Alva- rado- Niles & H [6] |
Alva- rado- Niles & H [6] |
Mis- sion & Tama- rack [6] |
Mis- sion & Tama- rack [6] |
Union City Blvd. & Lowry [6] |
Union City Blvd. & Rocklin [6] |
Union City Blvd. & Smith [6] |
Union City Blvd. & Smith [6] |
[3] |
Total Citations Issued as % of Events Recorded |
Total Violations Recorded/ Notices Printed [1] [4] |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jun05 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jul05 |
404 242 |
731 327 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
212 55 |
292 208 |
109 66 |
274 153 |
2022 1051 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Aug05 |
414 298 |
405 319 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
387 230 |
328 285 |
114 93 |
126 75 |
1774 1300 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sep05 |
293 213 |
275 221 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
433 309 |
142 95 |
213 121 |
173 105 |
1529 1064 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oct05 |
202 155 |
205 153 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
202 129 |
65 27 |
148 60 |
102 65 |
924 589 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nov05 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dec05 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jan06 |
267 181 |
274 210 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
176 149 |
142 101 |
126 98 |
103 84 |
1088 823 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jul06 |
191 95 |
306 183 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
140 85 |
71 50 |
114 79 |
114 63 |
936 555 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2006 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jan07 |
212 116 |
243 154 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
89 46 |
64 38 |
115 60 |
75 42 |
798 456 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jul07 |
194 103 |
229 123 |
247 174 |
195 123 |
90 50 |
34 27 |
68 50 |
93 55 |
1150 705 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jan08 |
135 96 |
140 96 |
225 173 |
207 125 |
59 41 |
45 35 |
57 44 |
76 52 |
944 662 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jul08 |
169 103 |
199 91 |
245 158 |
199 94 |
73 56 |
21 16 |
68 47 |
54 32 |
1028 597 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jan09 |
108 75 |
161 116 |
124 94 |
121 77 |
52 39 |
34 25 |
41 31 |
53 43 |
694 500 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jul09 |
147 84 |
238 130 |
131 88 |
118 57 |
60 32 |
23 17 |
57 37 |
61 36 |
835 481 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jan10 |
71 56 |
79 66 |
100 84 |
102 71 |
30 25 |
32 25 |
38 23 |
43 35 |
495 385 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apr10 |
71 57 |
81 68 |
99 73 |
98 65 |
61 46 |
45 34 |
49 38 |
56 38 |
560 419 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jul10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 |
This table made by highwayrobbery.net, using official reports provided by the City under the California Public Records Act.
Official reports, July 2005 - April 2010
[ ] indicates a footnote.
[1] Totals are as provided by the City.
[2] YTD = Year-to-date total.
[3] Un-used columns are to allow for later expansion of City's system.
[4] Any figures in red type (or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, the upper figure when there are two or more figures in a cell) are what RedFlex calls Total Violations, or all incidents recorded by the cameras, and due to time limitations may have been posted here only for selected months or locations. If there is sufficient public interest, the remaining months will be posted. The figures in black type are what RedFlex calls Notices Printed, and represent the sum of genuine citations issued (those filed with the court) plus any Nominations mailed (not filed with the court, a.k.a. Snitch Tickets).
[5] Due to time limitations (on the part of highwayrobbery.net and on the part of the City), data was requested for only the months shown.
[6] The camera enforcement is believed to be on traffic on the first-named street, but the direction of enforcement (north, south, east, west, thru, left, right) is not yet available.
[7] Includes enforcement of posted "no turn on red" signs.
"Late Time" Graphs
The City provided bar graphs of Late Times, etcetera, for all of its cameras, for July 2007 and April 2010.
These graphs track violations recorded, not tickets issued.
Where there is a large number of long Late Time violations in a curb lane, it is believed to indicate heavy ticketing on right turns.
(The curb lane will be the lane with the highest lane number.)
The picture above is an example from another city.
ALH-01 July 2007
ALH-01 April 2010
ALH-03 July 2007
ALH-03 April 2010
MITA-01 July 2007
MITA-01 April 2010
MITA-03 July 2007
MITA-03 April 2010
UNLO-01 July 2007
UNLO-01 April 2010
UNRO-01 July 2007
UNRO-01 April 2010
UNSM-01 July 2007
UNSM-01 April 2010
UNSM-03 July 2007
UNSM-03 April 2010
Union City Docs Set
# 3
More
Coming
There may be some more Union City
information
posted in the next few
weeks. Mark
your calendar to remind you to come back here and look!
---------------------------------
RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net