RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net


Email Address
Site Index by Subject

If you haven't already done so, please read the Lynwood section on the Camera Towns page

City of Lynwood Documents
(and Information)

  Lynwood, pop. 66,000, is 5 miles south of downtown Los Angeles.

Many RedFlex towns send out "Snitch Tickets," which you can ignore.  A Snitch Ticket will not have the Superior Court's name and address on it.  For more details, see the Snitch Ticket section on the Your Ticket page.

Be sure to read the "Countywide Information," which is Docs Set # 2 on the LA County Documents page.


Docs Set # 1
Ticket Counts


2008 - 2009 Counts

In April 2009 the City sent me some tables showing the money it received from the court, and the disposition of the tickets.  An intersection-by-intersection breakdown has been requested.


2004, 2009 Counts

Total Violations Recorded, Notices Printed, Citations Issued [4]

New 11-30-05, updated 5-7-12

Cam #

IMAT-01
IMLB-01










Imperial
WB @
Atlantic
Imperial
@
Long Beach




[3]

Total
Notices
Printed
as % of
Violations
Recorded
Total
Violations
Recorded/
Notices
Printed/
Citations
Issued
per

Invoices

[1] [4]

Nov04











Dec04









39

2004











Jan05









45

Feb05









47

Mar05









68

Apr05









39

May05









42

Jun05









16

Jul05









35

Aug05









40

Sep05











Oct05











Nov05











Dec05











2005











Jan08











Feb08











Mar08











Apr08











May08











Jun08
&
Jul08
731
200
118
52







849
252

Jul08











Aug08











Sep08











Oct08











Nov08











Dec08











2008











Jan09
226
46
161
43







387
89

Feb09
301
79
119
41







420
120

Mar09
349
83
178
45







527
128

Apr09
393
52
86
4







479
56

May09
372
33
126
36







498
69

Jun09
266
44
122
33







388
77

Jul09
345
109
57
16







402
125

Aug09
385
144
21
0







406
144

Sep09











Oct09
312
173
123
61







435
234

Nov09











Dec09











2009











Jan10
299
158
89
25







388
183

Feb10











Mar10











Apr10
273
115
73
26







346
141

May10











Jun10











Jul10
274
114
86
42







360
156

Aug10











Sep10











Oct10
124
2
102
39







226
41

Nov10











Dec10











2010











Jan11
219
85
105
55







324
140

Feb11











Mar11











Apr11
11
5
2
2







13
7

May11











Jun11











Jul11
294
35
117
25







411
60

Aug11
545
90
147
20







601
110

Sep11
417
190
179
102







596
292

Oct11
466
203
207
87







673
290

Nov11
386
111
162
42







548
153

Dec11
335
155
197
68







532
223

2011











Jan12
336
157
160
58







496
215

Feb12
279
141
217
124







496
265

Mar12
341
146
187
104







528
250

Apr12











May12











Jun12











Jul12











Aug12











Sep12











Oct12











Nov12











Dec12











2012











Jan13











Feb13











Mar13











Apr13











May13











Jun13











Jul13











Aug13











Sep13











Oct13











Nov13











Dec13











2013












This table made by highwayrobbery.net, using official documents obtained under the California Public Records Act.

2010 - 2012 official documents
2009 - 2012 official documents (additional months)

[  ] indicates a footnote.
[1]  Totals are as provided by the City.
[2]  YTD = Year-to-date total.
[3]  Un-used columns are to allow for later expansion of City's system.
[4]  Any figures in red type (or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, the upper figure when there are two or more figures in a cell) are what RedFlex calls Total Violations, or all incidents recorded by the cameras, and due to time limitations may have been posted only for selected months or locations.  If there is sufficient public interest, the remaining months will be posted.  The figures in black type are what RedFlex calls Notices Printed, and represent the sum of genuine citations issued (those filed with the court) plus any Nominations mailed (not filed with the court, a.k.a. Snitch Tickets).  Figures in blue type (or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, in italic type) are total Cites Issued (filed with the court), per RedFlex's monthly invoices to the City.
[5]  Data has been requested but has not yet been received.
[6]  The camera enforcement is believed to be on traffic on the first-named street, but the direction of enforcement (north, south, east, west, thru, left, right) is not yet available.




Lynwood Docs Set # 2
"Late Time" Graphs

The City provided bar graphs of Late Times, etcetera, for its camera.
These graphs track violations recorded, not tickets issued.
 Where there is a large number of long Late Time violations in a curb lane, it is believed to indicate heavy ticketing on right turns.
(The curb lane will be the lane with the highest lane number.)

Grand Terrace late times bar chart
The picture above is an example from another city.

Lynwood Bar Graphs, Imperial/Long Beach Bl. 2008 - 2009
Lynwood Bar Graphs, Imperial/Atlantic 2008 - 2009
Lynwood Bar Graphs, 2012

Bar graphs are available for other cities, too - see the list in the expanded version of Defect # 9.




Lynwood Docs Set # 3
The Contracts

Lynwood signed a pay-per-ticket contract with RedFlex on Dec. 18, 2003, just before the effective date of CVC 21455.5(g).  The contract provided:
"RedFlex will be paid $89 for the first three Citations issued on a single day from a particular Designated Intersection.  RedFlex will be paid $80 for the fourth and subsequent Citations issued on a single day from a particular Designated Intersection."

Then, on Dec. 18, 2008 the City signed a
new contract including an illegal "cost neutrality" clause, whereby the city will not have to pay RedFlex the full rent if there aren't enough fines to cover the cost.  See Subsection B. of Defect # 10.

The new contract penalizes the City should it choose not to enforce right-hand turn violations.

The new contract also says:  "Definitions.  'Warning Period' means a period after the Installation Date of the first intersection approach..."  (Emphasis added.)  See Defect # 6.

The new contract set the monthly fee per existing camera at $5000.

Had the council negotiated a $2900 fee like that in the 2007 contract of the City of Garden Grove, it could have saved $2100 per camera per month, or $252,000 for the two cameras over the 60 months of the contract.

Or, had the council negotiated a $2225 fee like that in the 2009 contract of the City of Solana Beach, it could have saved $333,000.

Or, had the council negotiated a $2500 fee like that in the 2009 contract of the City of Davis, it could have saved $300,000.


This list of contracts and amendments may not be up-to-date - there could be a contract or amendment later than the ones listed above.




Lynwood Docs Set # 4
More Coming


There may be some more information posted in the next few weeks.  Mark your calendar to remind you to come back here and look!




---------------------------------
RED LIGHT CAMERAS

www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net