RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net


Email Address

Site Index

If you haven't already done so, please read the Menlo Park section on the Camera Towns page

City of Menlo Park Documents
(and Information)

Some of Menlo Park's tickets can be ignored.  If your "ticket" does not have the Superior Court's name and address on it, it is what I call a "Fake Ticket."  For more details, see the Fake Ticket section on the Your Ticket page.

If you have a ticket from Menlo Park - even one you already have paid - be sure to read the "San Mateo County Information," which is Docs Set # 4 on the San Mateo Documents page - and contact me!


Special note, Summer 2013:  Menlo Park's contract with RedFlex is up for renewal - or not!  See Set # 4, below.


Do you live in the South end of Alameda County or the North end of Santa Clara County - State Sen. Ellen Corbett's District?

In Nov. 2014 Sen. Corbett will be termed out.

 This person

Wieckowski, author anti-motorist bill AB 666
 
R.A. Wieckowski, Author of the anti-motorist bill AB 666

  is running for Corbett's seat.

Please don't vote for him.

Send him back home to his bankruptcy law practice.


Menlo Park Docs Set # 1
Ticket Counts

Violations Recorded and Citations Issued [4]

Updated 5-26-13

Cam #
BAWI-01
ECRA-01
ECRA-03
ECVA-01









Bayfront
Expwy.
@
Willow
[5] [6] [7] [8]
El
Camino
@
Ravens-
wood
[6]
El
Camino
@
Ravens-
wood
[6]
El
Camino
@
Glenwood/
Valparaiso
[6]
Bayfront
Expwy.
@
Chilco
(proposed
in 2013)
[13]
Chilco
@
Bayfront
Expwy.
(proposed
in 2013)
[13]

[3]
Total
Issued
El Camino
Cameras
Only
Total
Cites
Issued
as %
of
Recorded
Total
Recorded/
Issued
All
Cameras


[1] [4]

Jan08












Feb08












Mar08












Apr08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0




0

0
0

May08
301
192
0
0
0
0
0
0




0

301
192

Jun08
342
207
0
0
0
0
0
0




0

342
207

Jul08
263
140
0
0
0
0
0
0




0

263
140

Aug08
277
191
82
54
177
85
0
0




139

536
330

Sep08
234
159
343
194
458
190
365
232




616

1400
775

Oct08
265
185
459
259
404
142
320
247




648

1448
833

Nov08
228
130
343
171
403
153
281
189




513

1255
643

Dec08
202
119
287
172
371
219
159
126




517

1019
636

2008
Actual
[14]
1323
850
789
794




2433

3756

2008
Projected
[14]








6882

8661

Jan09
198
110
296
188
313
220
222
162




570

1029
680

Feb09
152
92
143
34
281
180
204
131




345

780
437

Mar09
192
96
204
85
334
171
217
148




404

947
506

Apr09
218
81
267
130
336
163
226
141




434

1047
515

May09
191
89
278
178
344
216
289
172




566

1102
653

Jun09
192
117
256
170
362
213
408
202




585

1218
702

Jul09
214
114
223
142
266
150
174
96




388

877
502

Aug09
219
126
205
121
267
153
218
96




370

909
496

Sep09
208
114
195
100
222
109
247
134




343

872
457

Oct09
194
109
180
110
182
126
309
117




353

865
462

Nov09
179
104
206
119
220
137
213
98




354

818
458

Dec09
160
116
181
116
181
138
206
138




392

728
508

2009
[14]
1268
1493
1976
1635




5104

6376

Jan10
124
101
194
130
201
155
179
103




388

698
489

Feb10
157
116
183
142
108
65
166
96




303

614
419

Mar10
289
213
206
128
172
125
217
120




373

884
586

Apr10
269
177
152
102
141
82
75
42




226

637
403

May10
267
189
124
78
128
79
78
50




207

597
396

Jun10
277
185
195
129
180
98
96
48




275

748
460

Jul10
[5]
91
58
192
118
197
94
128
38




250

608
308

Aug10
49
36
196
143
160
72
141
80




295

546
331

Sep10
[8]
14
11
179
134
168
124
163
96




354

524
365

Oct10
[8]
12
9
117
77
182
124
190
120




321

501
330

Nov10
43
29
119
75
195
125
132
70




270

489
299

Dec10
45
27
158
108
143
99
165
103




310

511
337

2010
[14]
1151
1364
1242
966




3572

4723

Jan11
[9]
50
35
176
116
167
115
100
43




274

493
309

Feb11
68
46
163
104
157
105
91
34




243

479
289

Mar11
68
41
172
117
132
79
127
73




269

499
310

Apr11
[9]
77
45
124
72
143
66
108
49




187

452
232

May11
67
32
109
72
171
114
194
107




292

541
325

Jun11
67
35
95
76
159
94
220
118




288

541
323

Jul11
[9]
79
46
153
124
145
91
247
126




341

624
387

Aug11
81
50
152
124
164
85
240
130




339

637
389

Sep11
101
67
198
146
163
112
221
108




366

683
433

Oct11
[9]
89
57
230
162
193
132
216
117




411

728
468

Nov11
70
45
208
151
208
158
180
95




404

666
449

Dec11
62
34
192
143
213
154
188
105




402

655
436

2011
[14]
533
1407
1305
1105




3817

4350

Jan12
[9]
77
37
173
133
171
124
168
72




329

539
366

Feb12
[9]
67
44
114
87
152
112
132
79




278

465
322

Mar12
[9]
78
46
158
102
165
108
174
78




288

575
334

Apr12
[9]
72
42
157
111
107
80
207
114




305

543
347

May12
[9]
98
55
182
131
124
86
262
122




339

666
394

Jun12
[9]
185
109
157
111
61
33
289
150




294

692
403

Jul12
182
116
110
77
65
42
265
144




263

622
379

Aug12
[9]
151
81
137
97
144
92
273
149




338

705
419

Sep12
[9]
102
67
153
115
160
113
288
149




377

703
444

Oct12
[10]
92
63
163
115
117
80
298
167




362

670
425

Nov12
[9] [11]
36
26
27
20
24
11
11
8




39

98
65

Dec12
[11]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0




0

0
0

2012
Actual
[14]
686
1099
881
1232




3212

3898

2012
Projected
[14]
792
1295
1044
1469




3808

4600

2008 -
Oct12
[9]
8065
4946
9647
6197
10385
6193
10288
5730






38385
23066

Jan13
[11]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0




0

0
0

Feb13
41
25
116
68
112
53
244
156




277

513
302

Mar13
128
70
164
104
161
114
299
189




407

752
477

Apr13
123
51
132
78
100
58
264
147




283

619
334

May13












Jun13












Jul13












Aug13












Sep13












Oct13












Nov13












Dec13












2013
Actual
[14]
146
250
225
492




967

1113

2013
Projected
[14]
584
1000
900
1968




3868

4452


BAWI-01
ECRA-01
ECRA-03
ECVA-01
(proposed)
[13]
(proposed)
[13]


Total
Issued
El Camino
Cameras
Only

Total
Recorded/
Issued
All
Cameras


This table made by highwayrobbery.net, using official monthly reports of citations actually issued.  Those source documents are available at:

Cust. Mgmt. Reps.
Apr. 2008 - Mar. 2009
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. Apr. 2009 & Aug. 2010
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. Sep. & Oct. 2010
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. Nov. & Dec. 2010
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. 2011
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. 2012
Also see ticket counts in Set # 2, below.
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. 2008 - Oct. 2012 Grand Totals
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. Nov.  2012 - Jan. 2013
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. Feb. 2011 - Mar. 2013
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. Oct. 2012 - Apr. 2013
 
 [  ]  indicates a footnote.
  [1]  Except where noted otherwise, totals and percentages are as provided by the City.
  [2]  YTD = Year-to-date total.
[3]  Un-used columns are to allow for later expansion of City's system.
[4] Any figures in red type (or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, the upper figure when there are two or more figures in a cell) are what the city calls Total Violations (total incidents photographed by the camera), and due to time limitations may have been posted here only for selected months or locations.  If there is sufficient public interest, the remaining months will be posted.  The figures in black type represent the sum of genuine citations issued (those filed with the court) plus any Nominations mailed (not filed with the court, a.k.a. Snitch/phishing/fake Tickets).
[5]  See Set # 3, below.
[6]  The camera enforcement is believed to be on traffic on the first-named street, but the direction of enforcement (north, south, east, west, thru, left) is not yet available.
[7]  If you have a left turn ticket at Bayfront/Willow, see the expanded version of Defect # 9 - C, and Docs Set # 3, below.
[8]  Per City staff, a defective sensor at Bayfront/Willow was replaced on 11-22-10.  It may have been responsible for the low number of violations recorded during September and October.
[9]  Citywide total for this month is by highwayrobbery.net.
[10]  Data for this month was requested on 12-9-12.
[11]  According to the MPPD, the cameras on were inoperable because the re-paving on El Camino destroyed the in-ground sensors, and damage by a hit and run at Bayfront/Willow.
[12]  This report was generated just a few days after the end of the month, so the number of tickets issued may be low.
[13]  Proposed new camera.  See Set # 9, below.
[14]  Annual totals, or full-year projections based upon partial-year data shown in table above, are by highwayrobbery.net.




Menlo Park Docs Set # 2
"Late Time" Graphs

  The City has provided
bar graphs
of Late Times, etcetera, for all four of its cameras.
These graphs track violations recorded, not tickets issued.
Where there is a large number of long Late Time violations in a curb lane, it is believed to indicate heavy ticketing on right turns.
(The curb lane will be the lane with the highest lane number.)


Grand Terrace late times bar
                              chart
The picture above is an example from another city.

Ticket Counts May 2009 to Feb. 2010 & Bar Graphs - 6-Month Intervals
July 2009 Bar Graphs ECVA-01
July 2010 Bar Graphs & Ticket Counts Mar. 2010 to July 2010
July 2011 Bar Graphs (received in April 2013)
July 2012 Bar Graphs


Bar graphs are available for more than fifty other cities - see the list in the expanded version of Defect # 9.






Menlo Park Docs Set # 3
July 2010:  Bayfront/Willow Yellow Lengthened

On July 2, 2010 at 10 a.m. CalTrans lengthened the yellow for the westbound Bayfront/Willow left turn to 3.5 seconds, up from 3.0.
As a result, violations dropped by about 80% - see the Ticket Counts table, above.
Flipping these numbers over, we can see that the missing half second increased ticketing fivefold.
At Bayfront/Willow, approx. 3000 drivers were ticketed unfairly.  Approx. $1.3 million in fines.
If you have a pre-change ticket with a Late Time of 0.60 second or less, call the City and ask them to dismiss it.  And if they refuse, take it to court.
See also
a letter highwayrobbery.net wrote to the local assemblyman (who was elected to the State Senate in Nov. 2012).

It is also interesting to note that between February and March 2010, something caused the number of raw violations at Bayfront/Willow (in the table above, the figures in red) to double.  And, it happened again between May and June of 2012.




Menlo Park Docs Set # 4
The Contract - Council Meeting in July or Aug. 2013

2006 Contract

The city council approved a five year contract with RedFlex on Dec. 5, 2006.  It will expire in May 2013, unless renewed.

The 2006 contract includes an illegal "cost neutrality" clause, whereby the city will not have to pay RedFlex the full rent if there aren't enough fines to cover the cost.  See Subsection B. of Defect # 10.

The 2006 contract also says:  
Definitions.  "Warning Period" means the period of thirty (30) days after the Installation Date of the first intersection approach.  (Emphasis added.)  See Defect # 6.

In May 2013 the City and RedFlex signed an agreement to continue the program for two months, to allow time for contract negotiations.  At the June 11, 2013 council meeting, the council approved a further two-month extension, terminating Sept. 2. 

The staff report prepared for the June 11 meeting said that the proposed long-term renewal will be brought before the council at its meeting of Aug. 20.  But it could come up early, at the meeting of July 16.

This list of contracts and amendments was up-to-date as of 5-10-13.





Menlo Park Docs Set # 5
Status Report

At the Oct. 12, 2011 meeting of the City's Transportation Commission, the police made a presentation about the red light cameras.  The video of that meeting is available on the City's website.




Menlo Park Docs Set # 6
Encroachment Permits

Some of the City's cameras are located on CalTrans right-of-ways, so are operated under an encroachment permit obtained from CalTrans.  HighwayRobbery.net obtained these documents from CalTrans, via a public records request.

Issued Permit, 2007

Some other cities operate cameras under encroachment permits.  For more information about those cities and about CalTrans' criteria for the issuance of an encroachment permit, see the CalTrans section on the Links page.




Menlo Park Docs Set # 7
How Much They Get

To see how much fine money the Court sends to the City, go to Docs Set # 4 on the San Mateo Docs page.




Menlo Park Docs Set # 8
Info on City's Website

There is program info at the police department's website.
If the link does not work, drill down:
www.menlopark.com>
city departments>
police>
online resources>
red light photo enforcement




Menlo Park Docs Set # 9
2013:  Proposed New Rolling Right Cameras


Emails between the City and RedFlex (obtained via a Public Records Act request) reveal that they are thinking about putting one or two cameras at the corner of Bayfront and Chilco, and that rolling right turns could be 97% or more of the violations.
In the emails the sergeant who runs the camera program acknowledged that most of the violations are for right turns, but she didn't seem to be concerned about the fairness of that.  Rather, she worried whether the high rate of violations would be "sustainable."  The RedFlex sales rep - who formerly was a lieutenant with the Fremont police and ran the camera program there - was quick to reply:

"I can say that most intersections that have right turns enforced continue to produce consistent numbers."





Menlo Park Docs Set # 10
More Coming

There may be some more Menlo Park information posted in the next few weeks.  Mark your calendar to remind you to come back here and look!

 
*****
 
---------------------------------
RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net