RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net


Email Address

Site Index

If you haven't already done so, please read the Menlo Park section on the Camera Towns page

City of Menlo Park Documents
(and Information)

Some of Menlo Park's tickets can be ignored.  If your "ticket" does not have the Superior Court's name and address on it, it is what I call a "Fake Ticket."  For more details, see the Fake Ticket section on the Your Ticket page.

If you have a ticket from Menlo Park - even one you already have paid - be sure to read the "San Mateo County Information," which is Docs Set # 4 on the San Mateo Documents page - and contact me!


Menlo Park Docs Set # 1
Ticket Counts

Violations Recorded and Citations Issued [4]

Cam #
MEN
BAWI-01
MEN
ECRA-01
MEN
ECRA-03
MEN
ECVA-01









Bayfront
Expwy.
@
Willow
[5] [6] [7] [8]
El
Camino
@
Ravens-
wood
[6]
El
Camino
@
Ravens-
wood
[6]
El
Camino
@
Glenwood/
Valparaiso
[6]




[3]
Total
Cites
Issued
as %
of
Recorded
Total
Recorded/
Issued


[1] [4]

Jan08












Feb08












Mar08












Apr08
0
0
0
0






0

May08
301
192
0
0
0






301
192

Jun08
342
207
0
0
0






342
207

Jul08
263
140
0
0
0






263
140

Aug08
277
191
82
54
177
85
0






536
330

Sep08
234
159
343
194
458
190
365
232






1400
775

Oct08
265
185
459
259
404
142
320
247






1448
833

Nov08
228
130
343
171
403
153
281
189






1255
643

Dec08
202
119
287
172
371
219
159
126






1019
636

2008












Jan09
198
110
296
188
313
220
222
162






1029
680

Feb09
152
92
143
34
281
180
204
131






780
437

Mar09
192
96
204
85
334
171
217
148






947
506

Apr09
218
81
267
130
336
163
226
141






1047
515

May09
191
89
278
178
344
216
289
172






1102
653

Jun09
192
117
256
170
362
213
408
202






1218
702

Jul09
214
114
223
142
266
150
174
96






877
502

Aug09
219
126
205
121
267
153
218
96






909
496

Sep09
208
114
195
100
222
109
247
134






872
457

Oct09
194
109
180
110
182
126
309
117






865
462

Nov09
179
104
206
119
220
137
213
98






818
458

Dec09
160
116
181
116
181
138
206
138






728
508

2009












Jan10
124
101
194
130
201
155
179
103






698
489

Feb10
157
116
183
142
108
65
166
96






614
419

Mar10
289
213
206
128
172
125
217
120






884
586

Apr10
269
177
152
102
141
82
75
42






637
403

May10
267
189
124
78
128
79
78
50






597
396

Jun10
277
185
195
129
180
98
96
48






748
460

Jul10
[5]
91
58
192
118
197
94
128
38






608
308

Aug10
49
36
196
143
160
72
141
80






546
331

Sep10
[8]
14
11
179
134
168
124
163
96






524
365

Oct10
[8]
12
9
117
77
182
124
190
120






501
330

Nov10
43
29
119
75
195
125
132
70






489
299

Dec10
45
27
158
108
143
99
165
103






511
337

2010













This table made by highwayrobbery.net, using official monthly tabulations of citations actually issued.  Those source documents are available at:

Cust. Mgmt. Reps.
Apr. 2008 - Mar. 2009
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. Apr. 2009 & Aug. 2010
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. Sep. & Oct. 2010
Cust. Mgmt. Reps. Nov. & Dec. 2010
Also see ticket counts in Set # 2, below.

 
 [  ]  indicates a footnote.
  [1]  Totals and any percentages are as provided by the City.
  [2]  YTD = Year-to-date total.
[3]  Un-used columns are to allow for later expansion of City's system.
[4] Any figures in red type (or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, the upper figure when there are two or more figures in a cell) are what the city calls Total Violations (total incidents photographed by the camera), and due to time limitations may have been posted here only for selected months or locations.  If there is sufficient public interest, the remaining months will be posted.  The figures in black type represent the sum of genuine citations issued (those filed with the court) plus any Nominations mailed (not filed with the court, a.k.a. Snitch/phishing/fake Tickets).
[5]  See Set # 3, below.
[6]  The camera enforcement is believed to be on traffic on the first-named street, but the direction of enforcement (north, south, east, west, thru, left) is not yet available.
[7]  If you have a left turn ticket at Bayfront/Willow, see the expanded version of Defect # 9 - C, and Docs Set # 3, below.
[8]  Per City staff, a defective sensor at Bayfront/Willow was replaced on 11-22-10.  It may have been responsible for the low number of violations recorded during September and October.




Menlo Park Docs Set # 2
"Late Time" Graphs

  The City provided
bar graphs
of Late Times, etcetera, for all four of its cameras, at six-month intervals.
These graphs track violations recorded, not tickets issued.
Where there is a large number of long Late Time violations in a curb lane, it is believed to indicate heavy ticketing on right turns.
(The curb lane will be the lane with the highest lane number.)


Grand Terrace late times bar chart
The picture above is an example from another city.

Ticket Counts May 2009 to Feb. 2010 & Bar Graphs - 6-Month Intervals
July 2009 Bar Graphs ECVA-01
Ticket Counts Mar. 2010 to Jul. 2010 & Jul. 2010 Bar Graphs


Bar graphs are available for other cities, too - see the list in the expanded version of Defect # 9.






Menlo Park Docs Set # 3
July 2010:  Bayfront/Willow Yellow Lengthened

On July 2, 2010 at 10 a.m. CalTrans lengthened the yellow for the westbound Bayfront/Willow left turn to 3.5 seconds, up from 3.0.
As a result, violations dropped by about 80% - see the Ticket Counts table, above.
Flipping these numbers over, we can see that the missing half second increased ticketing fivefold.
At Bayfront/Willow, approx. 3000 drivers were ticketed unfairly.  Approx. $1.3 million in fines.
If you have a pre-change ticket with a Late Time of 0.60 second or less, call the City and ask them to dismiss it.  And if they refuse, take it to court.
See also
a letter highwayrobbery.net wrote to the local assemblyman.

It is also interesting to note that between February and March 2010, something caused the number of raw violations at Bayfront/Willow (in the table above, the figures in red) to double.




Menlo Park Docs Set # 4
The Contract, Etc.

2006 Contract

The city council approved the city's contract with RedFlex on Dec. 5, 2006.

The 2006 contract includes an illegal "cost neutrality" clause, whereby the city will not have to pay RedFlex the full rent if there aren't enough fines to cover the cost.  See Subsection B. of Defect # 10.

The 2006 contract also says:  
Definitions.  "Warning Period" means the period of thirty (30) days after the Installation Date of the first intersection approach.  (Emphasis added.)  See Defect # 6.

  Please note that there could be a contract or amendment later than the one listed above.





Menlo Park Docs Set # 5
Status Report

At the Oct. 12, 2011 meeting of the City's Transportation Commission, the police made a presentation about the red light cameras.  The video of that meeting is available on the City's website.





Menlo Park Docs Set # 6
More Coming

There may be some more Menlo Park information posted in the next few weeks.  Mark your calendar to remind you to come back here and look!



*****
 
---------------------------------
RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net