RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net

Email Address
Site Index

If you haven't already done so, please read the San Francisco section on the Camera Towns page
and the San Francisco, Main Page

City and County of San Francisco Documents
- Continuation Page -


Set # 1, Ticket Counts, is at
San Francisco, Main Page




Do you live in the South end of Alameda County or the North end of Santa Clara County - State Sen. Ellen Corbett's former District?

In 2014 Sen. Corbett "termed out," and has been replaced by this person


Wieckowski, author anti-motorist bill AB 666
 
R. A. Wieckowski, Author of the anti-motorist bill AB 666

  who will be running for re-election in 2018 and 2022.

Please don't vote for him.

Send him back home to his bankruptcy law practice.



San Francisco Docs Set # 2

"Film Viewing Reports"

To see some of the official reports from which the Ticket Counts table (on the main SF page) was derived, click: 
Annual Summaries, 1997 - Sept. 2004

Annual Summary 2004
Annual Summary 2005
Annual Summary 2006
Annual Summary 2007
Annual Summary 2008
Annual Summary 2009

Annual Summary 2010
Annual Summary 2011
Annual Summary 2012
2013 to May
Annual Summary 2013
2014 to Oct.




San Francisco Docs Set # 3
  Some Defendants' Experiences in Court
New 3-25-05, updated 8-7-13

From 2005:

"After failing the trial by declaration, I did the trial de novo in SF traffic court. After roll call, they asked if anyone wanted to take traffic school and a number of people did.  Just before the trials started they asked again, strongly implying this was the last chance, but stated, "After the trial, you may not be granted traffic school."  Heavy!  I don't know if this was so in later cases because mine was the second trial and the first one was tried in absentia.
The commissioner  had the officer state her case and show the photos.  She ticked off all the vital stats, where, when, etc. but said, "The driver's photo matches the stated age range and characteristics of the registered owner."  Curious.  She did not say anything like, "The photo of the driver and the owner of the vehicle are the same."  The commissioner asked me if I wanted to question the officers statement, or the technician who was also present, or give my version of events (confess?).
I declined and went right to step one, questioning the photo of the driver.  I said,"The photo is rather blurry. You must have a clear photo."  The color photo original, as you pointed out, was little better than the black and white copy mailed to me.  Half the face is obscured by mirror and sunglasses and the rest is so fuzzy you can't even make out what the nose looks like.  The commissioner looked at the photo for a minute and said,"The face looks about as clear as a department store mannequin's. Dismissed!"
Another thing I noticed about this photo packet was the traffic light was obscured by the Gatsometer box so you couldn't see if the light was actually red though I didn't have the chance to point this out.  So there I was all prepared for a hard slog and I got as far as step one!  Thanks for your help. I'm glad this ordeal is finally over.
I noticed your news about automated photo radar [possibly] being on the way.  Groan.  Unlike the movie, I suspect our Governator will support this Rise of the Machines.  [For more info about the speed cameras, see the Legislation section on the Action page.]  As for the warning signs in San Francisco, they are a bit hard to measure as they are so high off the ground, often perched high atop a light standard so I guess we'd have to take the sign installers word for it they are the right dimensions.
The moral of this story? Drive carefully because it's the right thing to do and Big Brother is watching."


From 2013:

In San Francisco, the traffic court, and even the Appellate Division, are in a sad state.  Read the David case, on highwayrobbery's Library page.






San Francisco Docs Set # 4
Program Details


The City of San Francisco has, on its website, a history of the program.

highwayrobbery.net has an
archive copy of the 2011 version of that history, which has much more information, including how and why the (statewide) fine grew to be so large.

The Superior Court has information at
http://www.sfsuperiorcourt.org/index.aspx?page=179

If these pages have gone away, use the archive.





San Francisco Docs Set # 5
The Contract, and the Price

The City has provided the following contract documents.

Contract, Pt. 1
Contract, Pt. 2 (Appendices)
Board of Supervisors Resolution
1st Amendment (adds five cameras)
2nd Amendment (sets min. compensation for ACS' employees)
3rd Amendment (extends term to Dec. 2009)
4th Amendment (makes technical changes)
5th Amendment (extends term to Dec. 2010)
May 2011 Contract (Big File)

The contract signed in May 2011 expires on Apr. 30, 2014, but can be terminated at any time, at the convenience of the City.
In Appendix A of the contract, there is a provision for ten decoy cameras - which will flash and record data but (apparently) not generate tickets.

A defendant requested information about the profitability of the program, and was sent this document:

San Francisco red light cameras profit summary

Invoices from early 2013 and late 2013 showed that the City paid Xerox $100,000 per month for the cameras, or about $2700 per month for each of the 37 cameras which were active throughout 2013.

On the April 15, 2014 agenda of the San Francisco MTA Board was a staff report recommending extending the red light camera program for another two years, to 2016, with no reduction in price.  The Board approved it, with no discussion.


This list of contracts and amendments may not be up-to-date - there could be a contract or amendment later than the ones listed above.




San Francisco Docs Set # 6
The Judges

Judge Perker Meeks (Ret.)
Judge (Ret.) Perker Meeks

Judge Meeks retired in 2006, and now works as a temporary judge.  I strongly recommend doing a Peremptory Challenge to remove him from your case.
Profile



San Francisco Docs Set # 7
Encroachment Permits

Some of the City's cameras are located on CalTrans right-of-ways, so are operated under an encroachment permit obtained from CalTrans.  HighwayRobbery.net obtained these documents from CalTrans, via a public records request.

Various, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2006

Some other cities operate cameras under encroachment permits.  For more information about those cities and about CalTrans' criteria for the issuance of an encroachment permit, see the CalTrans section on the Links page.



San Francisco Docs Set # 8
"No Right Turn on Green" Camera at Octavia

Read AB 2729 (of 2010) on the Action/Legis page.



San Francisco Docs Set # 9
More Coming

There may be some more San Francisco information posted here in the next few weeks.  Mark your calendar to remind you to come back here and look!



---------------------------------
RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net