|
Email Address
Site
Index
If you
haven't already done so, please read the Hawthorne section on
the Camera Towns page
City of Hawthorne Documents
(and Information)
Hawthorne, pop. 80,000, is just southeast of
LAX.
Some of Hawthorne's tickets can be ignored. If your "ticket" does
not have the Superior Court's name and address on it, it is what I call
a "Fake Ticket." For more details, see the
Fake Ticket section on the Your Ticket page, and Set # 4, below.
Details of recent trials and arraignments of Hawthorne tickets are at: Hawthorne Chronology.

Hawthorne Contacts
City Hall, 4455
W. 126th St., Hawthorne, CA 90250
(1 block west of Hawthorne Blvd.)
Councilmembers' email addresses are:
Mayor Larry Guidi - larryguidi@earthlink.net
Pablo Catano - pablo.catano@sen.ca.gov
Gary Parsons - gary@garyparsons.org
Ginny Lambert - via council secretary at citymgrEXEC@earthlink.net
Louis Velez - louvel1@yahoo.com
Council meetings: Second and fourth Tuesdays at 6 p.m.
Opportunity for public to speak: After ceremonial items at
beginning of council meeting. Call (310) 970-7900 to confirm
council meeting date or to leave a message for the mayor or
councilmembers.
Hawthorne Chamber of
Commerce
4444 El Segundo Blvd., Hawthorne, CA 90250
hawchamber@aol.com
(310) 676-1173
Hawthorne Docs Set # 1
Signal Timing
Updated 12-11-04
At the Aug. 24, 2004 court trials, Officer Mark Escalante noted that the
city had filed, with the court, a survey of the timing of the
lights. This is that survey, obtained through a public records request made to the City.

It
is clear to me that were Hawthorne to raise their left-yellows to 4.0
seconds, there would be a huge decrease in red light running, as there
was in Mesa, Arizona.
In September 2004 I lobbied Mr. Smith, his boss Interim Director of Public
Works Stanley E. Scholl, City Manager Richard Prentice, Sgt. Keith
Kauffman who runs the camera program, as well as the entire city
council, to make that change. I showed them the Mesa
figures. But, as Mr. Prentice said, "We're not gonna change it."
A Change Occurs, Anyway
On
Oct. 14, 2004 I made a Public Records Act request for the signal timing
charts for Hawthorne's four camera-monitored intersections. (Signal timing charts show the length of the yellow, as
programmed into the signal controller.) I asked for "...the present signal timing settings. Also any previous versions... (with)
settings in use Jan. 1, 2003 or thereafter."
The request was sent to the County Department of Public Works, which
maintains and programs Hawthorne's signals. On Nov. 10 I received
the charts. The sole Hawthorne / El Segundo chart, dated 1998,
showed the same settings indicated in Mr. Smith's letter, above.
But there were two different charts for Rosecrans / Hindry. The
newest one, dated 9-29-04, showed a 4.0-second yellow for
northbound Hindry - different from Mr. Smith's letter.
(In these charts, northbound Hindry is phase 4.)

Click here to see the complete 9-29-04 chart.
The other chart, below, was completed in 2001, and showed the 3.0-second yellow mentioned in Mr. Smith's letter.
Since drivers in the northbound
left-turn lane have the option of going straight across (into the
shopping center), I believe that the yellow was lengthened because 3.0
seconds would be too short for that straight-through movement.
Click here to see the complete 9-19-01 chart.
The new Rosecrans / Hindry chart did not include a lengthening of the yellow
for the westbound left turn ("WBL"), Phase 5. It remains at 3.0
seconds. However, some of the supplemental pages (the charts are
actually 17 pages long, each) included some changes to the lengths of
the green lights at various times of day. Those changes are presented in the table below.
Phase
|
Time of Day (M - F)
|
Up to 9-28-04
|
9-29-04 and After
|
4 - NB
|
5:30 - 9:30 a.m.
|
25
|
19
|
4 - NB
|
9:30 - 3:00
|
24
|
30
|
4 - NB
|
3:00 - 8:00 p.m.
|
24
|
25
|
5 - WBL
|
5:30 - 9:30 a.m. |
10
|
10
|
5 - WBL
|
9:30 - 3:00 |
17
|
25
|
5 - WBL
|
3:00 - 8:00 p.m. |
19
|
16 |
Table made by highwayrobbery.net
WBL = Westbound Left
NB = Northbound Straight and Turns
Why the Yellow Time was Changed
On Nov. 23 I made a Public Records Act request (to County Public Works Dept.) for "the radar speed checks and
any other measurements of traffic conditions, speed or volume, that were
ordered, or considered, as part of the Department's Sept. 2004 examination of
the timing of the signals at Rosecrans/Hindry and Hawthorne/El Segundo, in the
City of Hawthorne."
On Dec. 10 I received the following June 14, 2004 chart, showing a 34
mph 85th Percentile speed on Hindry. There are no speed
limit signs posted on Hindry.

Each "x" represents one car in the speed sampling of 100 cars.
City Wants to Change It Back to the Way It Was
At the trials of Jan. 11,
2005, Officer Mullen testified that the City was asking the county
(which maintains and sets the signal) to change the northbound Hindry yellow back to 3.0. If
you would like to let the county know your opinion about the change the
City is requesting, contact the office of the County Supervisor for the
district in which you reside. Their phone numbers are:
Don Knabe (310) 322-1222 or (213) 974-4444
Yvonne Burke (213) 974-2222
Zev Yaroslavsky (213) 974-3333 or (818) 901-3831
Michael Antonovich (213) 974-5555
Gloria Molina (213) 974-4111
Hawthorne Docs Set # 2
Ticket Counts
Violations Recorded, Notices Printed, and Citations
Issued (4)
Updated 11-11-05
On Aug. 26, 2004 I faxed the City a request for the counts, as follows.
"A. For each red light camera installation (a.k.a.
"approach") in the city, the monthly (or other periodic) tabulation
of violations issued or discarded, from the onset of the program to the
present." On Sept. 23 the City Clerk replied:
"No documents exist which are responsive to Request No. A."
On Oct. 4, I faxed the City a new request, as follows.
"B. All invoices from RedFlex to the City, or other requests to
pay RedFlex, with all attachments or exhibits thereto."
On
Oct. 6 the City Clerk's office supplied copies of RedFlex invoices
containing monthly totals of Cites Issued (and filed with the
court). Those totals were
entered into the table, below, as "Totals Cites Issued per
Invoices." RedFlex invoiced the City $89 for each cite issued
(and filed). There was no camera-by-camera breakdown of cites
issued.
On Nov. 10, 2004 the City provided a RedFlex "Customer Violations Report"
having
camera-by-camera data for the entire period the camera system had been
operating. While the Report did not include a month-by-month
breakdown, it was possible to see that the Rosecrans / Hindry cameras (which
started on April 19) had been averaging about 1000 notices per month.
That is the most I have seen recently at any intersection in California. That count equals the
1999 - 2000 results from San Diego's infamous
Harbor / Grape left-turn camera. The current runners-up (as of early 2005) to
Rosecrans / Hindry are Harbor / Warner in Santa Ana and Crenshaw /
108th in Inglewood, which recently averaged 744 and 716 tickets per
month respectively, Ming / South Real in Bakersfield, which
briefly averaged 660 tickets per month, and Firestone / Atlantic in
South Gate, which averaged 620 tickets per month during the first half
of 2004. For more info about San Diego, Santa Ana, Inglewood,
Bakersfield or
South Gate, see the Camera Towns page.
On
Jan. 4, 2005 the City provided, for the first time, month-by-month data
for each camera, and it has been posted below. Additional
month-by-month data was received on June 3. Current data was
requested on Nov. 7, 2005 and will be posted as soon as it is received.
Snitch Tickets
The City's
use of
Nominations (a.k.a. Snitch Tickets) probably explains,
(A) the discrepancy between the figures for Notices
Printed and
Total Cites Issued (filed with the court), and
(B) the month-to-month
overlap in the serial numbers.
See the table's footnotes for further details.
|
Haw-
thorne
@
El
Segundo
Left
|
Haw-
thorne
@
El
Segundo
Left
|
Haw-
thorne
@
Imperial
|
Haw-
thorne
@
Imperial
|
Hindry
NB@
Rose-
crans
Right
and
Left
(5)
|
Imperial
@
Free-
man
|
Rose-
crans
WB@
Hindry
Left
(5)
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial
Number
Range
of Cites
Issued
This
Month,
per
Invoices
(6)
|
Total
Notices
Printed
as % of
Violations
Recorded
|
Total
Violations
Recorded/
Notices
Printed/
Cites
Issued
per
Invoices
(1) (4) (6)
|
Cam #
|
HAES
01
|
HAES
03
|
HAIM
01
|
HAIM
03
|
HIRO
01
|
IMFR
01
|
ROHI
01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr04
(6)
|
67
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
783
610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00695 - 00716
|
70%
|
1182
829
17
|
May04
(6)
|
139
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
844
640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00702- 01747
|
69%
|
1292
887
724
|
Jun04
(6)
|
134
|
84
|
|
|
1286
867
|
|
776
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00703- 03344
|
68%
|
2444
1669
1150
|
Jul04
(6)
|
129
|
109
|
7
|
26
|
937
676
|
163
|
735
577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00744- 04702
|
73%
|
2312
1687
1036
|
Aug04
(6)
|
83
|
63
|
107
|
53
|
903
675
|
192
|
613
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01321- 06444
|
68%
|
2313
1584
1387
|
Apr-
Aug
Totals
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9543
6656
4314
|
Sep04
(5)
|
107
|
58
|
47
|
74
|
692
497
|
101
|
573
374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65%
|
1934
1258
|
Oct04
|
91
|
54
|
120
|
65
|
374
260
|
122
|
417
284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64%
|
1568
996
|
Nov04
|
92
|
53
|
86
|
60
|
501
391
|
127
|
509
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68%
|
1687
1151
|
Dec04
|
87
|
69
|
98
|
28
|
514
317
|
84
|
558
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57%
|
1750
997
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan05
|
94
|
116
|
84
|
55
|
382
235
|
113
|
483
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54%
|
1870
1012
|
Feb05
|
79
|
104
|
142
|
44
|
393
223
|
120
|
447
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56%
|
1772
999
|
Mar05
|
48
|
103
|
181
|
43
|
490
276
|
109
|
457
298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59%
|
1789
1058
|
Apr05
|
83
|
104
|
186
|
31
|
1050
665
|
39
|
259
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56%
|
2234
1247
|
May05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This table
made by highwayrobbery.net, using official city documents obtained under the California Public Records Act.
( ) indicates a footnote.
(1) Totals as provided by the City.
(2) Totals by highwayrobbery.net
(3) Un-used columns are to allow for later expansion of City's system.
(4) Figures in red type
(or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, the upper
figure when there are two or more figures in a cell) are what RedFlex calls Total
Violations, or all incidents recorded by
the cameras, and due to time limitations may have been posted
only for selected months or locations.
If there is sufficient public interest, the remaining months will be
posted. The figures in black
type are what RedFlex calls Notices Printed, and represent the
sum of genuine citations issued (those filed with the court) plus
Nominations mailed (not filed with the court, a.k.a. Snitch
Tickets). Figures in blue
type (or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, in italic type) are
total Cites Issued (filed with the court), per RedFlex's monthly invoices to the City.
(5) On Sept. 29, 2004 the yellow for northbound Hindry was
increased, from 3.0 up to 4.0 seconds, and adjustments were made to the
length of the green lights. See Set # 1, above, for more details. (6)
The only invoices (of Cites Issued) received, so far, covered Apr. to
Aug. 2004. The invoices do not contain a camera-by-camera
breakdown of Cites Issued.
Hawthorne Docs Set # 3
Rosecrans / Hindry Cameras Not Justified
New 11-14-04
Hawthorne's Rosecrans / Hindry intersection with its camera enforcement on left and right turns, is an
excellent example of an intersection where there is scant safety
justification for the use of the cameras. Here you
can look at the official 10-year accident history for the intersection,
and decide for yourself. (Big file! 400 kb)
See also Defect # 9 on the Home page, and FAQ # 27.
Hawthorne Docs Set # 4
Snitch Ticket
Here's an example of a Hawthorne Snitch Ticket, a.k.a. "Nomination"
Hawthorne Docs Set # 5
Read about the Mayor and Council
Guidiwatch.com
is a website about Larry Guidi, the longtime Mayor of Hawthorne.
It also discusses his friend and fellow councilmember Louis "Big Kitty"
Velez, who was indicted for conflict of interest on July 25, 2007.
Hawthorne Docs Set # 6
Trial Transcript
This Hindry-Rosecrans right-turn trial transcript shows how close a judge can
come to convicting you - when it may not have been you - and also is an example of
what may be improper arm-twisting by a judge.
Hawthorne Docs Set # 7
More
Coming
There may be some more Hawthorne information
posted in the next few weeks. Mark your calendar to remind
you to come back here and look!
Details of recent trials of Hawthorne tickets are at: Hawthorne
Chronology.
---------------------------------
RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net
|