RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net

Email Address
Site Index

If you haven't already done so, please read the Newark section on the Camera Towns page

Newark Documents

Some of Newark's "tickets" can possibly be ignored.  If your ticket does not have the Superior Court's name and address on it, it is a fake ticket, what I call a "Snitch Ticket."  For more details, see the Snitch Ticket section on the Your Ticket page.

If you have a Newark red light camera ticket, be sure to look at the Countywide Information, on the Oakland Documents page.


Newark Docs Set # 1
Ticket Counts

Total Violations, Notices Printed [4]

New 8-14-10, updated 12-22-11

Cam #
CEMO
01
CHMO
01
MOCE
01
NEJA
01
NEJA
03











CITY
OF
NEWARK
CALIF.
Cedar
Nbd at
Mowry
left
&
straight
[7]
Cherry
Sbd at
Mowry
lefts
straight
&
right
[7]

Mowry
Wbd at
Cedar
lefts
straights
&
right
[7]
Newark
Nbd at
Jarvis
left
&
straights
[6]

Newark
at
Jarvis
lefts
straights
&
right
[6]






[3]

Total
Citations
Issued
as %
of Events
Re-
corded
Total
Violations
Recorded/
Notices
Printed
[1] [4]

Aug06

70
39












70
39

Sep06

53
33












53
33

Oct06
158
66
61
34
9
2











228
102

Nov06
586
212
57
33
714
396











1357
641

Dec06
723
202
29
16
576
443











1328
661


[5]














Jan07
666
306
31
20
483
385











1180
711

Feb07
526
289
27
18
225
177











778
484

Mar07
531
246
38
27
275
193
52
27
1416
692









2312
1185

Apr07
423
139
40
23
388
213
70
38
1355
841









2276
1254

May07
571
139
54
29
458
232
61
31
1150
676









2294
1107

Jul07
529
246
25
17
370
219
66
35
16
1









1006
518


[5]














Jan08
297
157
33
18
274
166
36
20
474
256









1114
617

Jul08
252
183
23
4
245
134
28
11
382
175









930
507


[5]














Jan09
259
220
14
10
298
228
27
16
315
223









913
697

Jul09
225
164
41
16
249
144
21
7
355
243









891
574


[5]














Jan10
280
224
31
19
216
168
8
2
206
144









741
557

Feb10
[5]














Mar10
[5]














Apr10
359
232
20
9
284
173
24
4
297
165









985
583

May10
252
171
41
32
269
125
26
7
295
165









883
500

Jun10
294
209
32
25
236
146
13
10
258
165









833
555

Jul10
384
299
33
27
306
212
9
4
254
172









986
714

Aug10
[5]















Sep10
219
151
47
38
224
156
8
3
314
211









812
559

Oct10
292
153
28
10
232
109
28
11
264
115









844
398

Nov10
336
210
38
24
292
168
13
5
300
198









979
605

Dec10
335
241
33
15
261
151
18
10
280
197









927
615


















Jan11
298
232
49
24
246
126
-
-
167
133









760
535

Feb11
251
172
36
20
241
182
-
-
290
216









818
590

Mar11
321
220
36
17
273
183
-
-
304
216









934
636

Apr11
328
226
25
17
252
174
-
-
289
188









894
605

May11
357
229
27
17
305
196
-
-
333
228









1022
670

Jun11
401
261
22
15
317
209
-
-
304
220









1044
705

Jul11
381
240
41
32
333
223
-
-
194
136









949
631

Aug11
368
224
37
25
357
230
-
-
290
191









1052
670

Sep11
318
220
41
18
345
253
-
-
350
245









1054
736

Oct11
344
253
33
18
397
282
-
-
345
239









1119
792

Nov11
289
212
34
21
266
182
-
-
373
272









962
687

Dec11


































This table made by highwayrobbery.net, using official reports provided by the City under the California Public Records Act.

The official reports for April - June 2010 are part of Docs Set # 3, below.
Official reports, 2006 - 2010
Official reports, late 2010
Official reports, 2011
If you would like to crunch or graph the numbers, use this Excel spreadsheet:
Activations and Citations, 2006 - 2010

[  ] indicates a footnote.
[1]  Totals are as provided by the City.
[2]  YTD = Year-to-date total.
[3]  Un-used columns are to allow for later expansion of City's system.
[4]  Except where noted otherwise, the figures given in the table are for the single calendar month indicated.  Any figures in red type (or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, the upper figure when there are two or more figures in a cell) are what RedFlex calls Total Violations, or all incidents recorded by the cameras, and due to time limitations may have been posted here only for selected months or locations.  If there is sufficient public interest, the remaining months will be posted.  The figures in black type are what RedFlex calls Notices Printed, and represent the sum of genuine citations issued (those filed with the court) plus any Nominations mailed (not filed with the court, a.k.a. Snitch Tickets).
[5]  Additional monthly or half-year data, and annual totals, are available in the spreadsheet linked above.
[6]  The camera enforcement is believed to be on traffic on the first-named street, but the direction of enforcement (north, south, east, west, thru, left, right) may not be accurate.
[7]  Direction of enforcement from list provided by the City.




Newark Docs Set # 2
"Late Time" Graphs

These graphs track violations recorded, not tickets issued.
Where there is a large number of long Late Time violations in a curb lane, it is believed to indicate heavy ticketing on right turns.
(The curb lane will be the lane with the highest lane number.)

The City has provided bar graphs for a 12-month period in 2009 & 2010, plus July 2007, 2010, and 2011.
See the links, below.

Grand Terrace late times bar chart
The picture above is an example from another city.

CEMO-01 Jul07
CEMO-01 Jul10
CEMO-01  Nov09 - Oct10
CEMO-01 Jul11
CEMO-01 Jan12

CHMO-01 Jul07
CHMO-01 Jul10
CHMO-01  Nov09 - Oct10
CHMO-01 Jul11
CHMO-01 Jan12

MOCE-01 Jul07
MOCE-01 Jul10
MOCE-01  Nov09 - Oct10
MOCE-01 Jul11
MOCE-01 Jan12

NEJA-01 Jul07
NEJA-01 Jul10
NEJA-01  Nov09 - Oct10

NEJA-03 Jul07
NEJA-03 Jul10
NEJA-03  Nov09 - Oct10
NEJA-03 Jul11
NEJA-03 Jan12

Bar graphs are available for more than forty other cities - see the list in the expanded version of Defect # 9.




Newark Docs Set # 3
Signal Timing Charts

In Aug. 2010 the City provided
signal timing charts (and the April - June 2010 ticket counts shown in the table above).



Newark Docs Set # 4
The Contract, Etc.

2006 Contract
2010 Amendment
2011 Renewal (16MB file)

Until a Jan. 20, 2010 amendment, the 2006 contract included an illegal "cost neutrality" clause, whereby the city did not have to pay RedFlex
 the full rent if the City's fine revenue was insufficient to cover the rent. See Subsection B. of Defect # 10. 

2011:  New Contract

On Apr. 14, 2011 the city council voted 5 - 0 to accept a new 5-year contact under which the City will pay $5700 monthly rent per camera for four of the five existing cameras.  The camera covering northbound Newark/Jarvis is to be removed.

They paid way too much.

Had the council negotiated a $3052 rent like that in the 2010 contract of the City of Oceanside (available on the Oceanside Documents page), it could have saved $2648 per camera per month, or $635,520 for the four cameras over the 60 months of the contract.

  The city council didn't need to agree to a five-year term in order to get a good price. The City of Hawthorne's three-year contract (available on the Hawthorne Documents page) sets a $2800 rent for its seven original cameras.  Had the council negotiated a $2800 rent like Hawthorne's, it could have saved $2900 per camera per month, or $696,000 over the 60 months of the contract.

Nor did the city council need to agree to pay $6200 for the new cameras that are to be added to the system.  A close-by example:  Burlingame paid only $5870.  Had Newark obtained the same rate as Burlingame, the City could have saved $118,800 over five years.

Thus, the city council gave away over $800,000 of City money, just because it failed to negotiate hard on the rent.

There is another problem with the contract.  The contract contains no adequate escape clause should a future council wish to terminate the contract, or if the voters terminate the contract via initiative.  A complete contract will include a formula by which the full cost of such a "for convenience" termination is to be calculated. While Section 6.1 of the contract does specify $1000 per month per camera - a figure that is much too high to retire five-year-old (or more) equipment -  the section also requires the City to pay unspecified "...out-of-pocket and/or direct costs and expenses."  For an example of a more complete formula - albeit one still having much-too-high prices - see Section 6.2 in the City of Victorville's original contract (available on the Victorville Documents page).

The Newark contracts may also be available at the NPD website - see Set # 5, below.

This list of contracts and amendments may not be up-to-date - there could be a contract or amendment later than the ones listed above.




Newark Docs Set # 5
Info on NPD Site

The Newark PD has extensive materials on its website, including copies of the contracts (see Exh. 1 of the Court Discovery Documents on the site).
If the above link ceases to work, drill down: www.newark.org > Departments > Police > Field ops > Red light cameras.



Newark Docs Set # 6
More Coming

  Here is a
video of a technical violation at a Newark intersection.



Newark Docs Set # 7
More Coming

There may be some more Newark information posted in the next few weeks.  Mark your calendar to remind you to come back here and look!

---------------------------------
RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net